Monday, December 20, 2010

Monsignor Charles Kavanagh defrocked

Does defrocking hurt? No? Then why is Catholic priest Charles Kavanagh shown crying after he was defrocked by a Church tribunal? Buck up pedopriest, your new life as 73-year-old unemployed child molester awaits. What does a washed up priest who was cast away from his church like so much trash have to look forward too? A greeter at Wal-Mart maybe? How would that interview work?

“So, I see you used to be a Catholic priest, can you tell me why you are no longer working as a priest?”

“I was sacked for buggering children”, replies Kavanagh.

“Right, can you start Monday?”

If you can’t tell, I’m not really a fan of Wal-Mart either.

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

Based on the story of the case, the Catholic Church has gone from one extreme to another. Before, the Church covers up its priests, now it feeds its priests to lions. There was no touching or sexual act in this case. The accuser simply FELT the priest attempted to molest him. A civil court could has been more just to Fr. Kavanagh.

Dromedary Hump said...

According to the Pope, none of this priestly sexual misconduct is their fault. He said it's a result of secular society. So much for the Church's taking responsibility for it's own. That damnable old nazi pope should be hung up by his balls... along with his priests.

http://www.examiner.com/humanist-in-national/pope-blames-secular-society-for-clergy-sexually-abusing-children

Anonymous said...

read a letter kavanagh wrote to the parents of Daniel - it reads like a love letter - and decide whether this was a healthy relationship between a man in his fortys and a teenage boy

http://www.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/nyregion/20060914_PRIEST_LETTER_test.pdf