Friday, November 06, 2009

Feed the poor or play politics?

I like to play a game with myself when I am confronted by strange behavior. I put myself in their place for some role playing. In this case, I assume the role of a pastor asking for donations to his food bank. My role is to feed the homeless in a depressed economy. I need food. I ask myself, under what conditions would I turn down an offer of free food? I can’t think of any because food is food.  It feeds people. My mission is to feed people. I would accept a gift of food from anyone.

For the cynics out there, I actually go through this proces. It’s a mental exercise I go through when I do not understand the motives of the people involved in an illogical situation. It helps me understand if their motives are authentic. In this case, the motives failed.

Chris Solberg, director of Loaves and Fishes, a Christian charity in beautiful Shasta County, declined an offer of free food.

"The Lord impressed on me to tell him thanks, but no thanks," he said, adding that he does not regret that decision. "I feel good about the decision. It felt like a weight was lifted off my shoulders."

I thought this statement odd sense this is what they say on their website:

Redding Loaves and Fishes is supported by area grocers, philanthropic community service clubs, church charities and generous and charitable individuals. We are a coalition of local food banks, food assistance providers,and community members. Due to the high number of persons in poverty needing food assistance charities in the Redding and Shasta County area, the program's food bank supply is often exhausted before the end of each month, when need is the highest. Sometimes the food bank program calls on other food banks and charities in Redding and Shasta County for emergency supplies, and visa versa. We gladly accept canned fruits, vegetables and meats, "meal in a can " items such as chili, ravioli, stews, and chunky soups; staples such as peanut butter, jams, jellies and tuna; packaged goods such as pastas and potato and rice dishes, as well as cereal.

I don’t see anything about judging the source of the donation. Yet they did.

he finally realized, once he got off the phone with him, that they were medical marijuana shops.

He said he does not support them and their proliferation.

"They are all over," Solberg said, calling them a "pestilence" and "travesty" in the community.

Solberg said he believed the food offer was made because the marijuana collective was "trying to validate themselves."

Director Solberg made a value judgment based on his religious convictions which results in hurting his core cause of feeding the homeless. The homeless do not know that the beans were donated by a medical marijuana dispensary. They think the beans came from nice Christians. Solberg decision is irrational. Plus, he thinks his decision is biblical instead of political, which is further proof of his irrational thinking.

"As director of Loaves and Fishes, I will continue to run it in a biblical manner, and not a political manner,” he said.

I wonder if Solberg would accept donations from an Atheist organization? Perhaps we should call and ask? (530) 241-1108 or send an email info@reddinglovesandfishes.com.

To Joe and Gina Munday – nice try. I encourage you to continue looking for a way to help. There are other organizations that do not judge the giver but instead focus on helping the needed.

Technorati Tags: ,,

Comments (13)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
I oppose religious 'charities' for man reasons and the example you cited is just one of them. It makes me sick that our tax dollars support scum like them.
I find it funny that they thought this was an attempt by the store to be legit. I guess they don't understand that it is legit and has probably helped more to cut down on crime then anything they have done. If you can cut down the crime rate I think you cut down the need for any types of charity. I wonder how many liqueur stores give to his charity or other businesses he might be against?
1 reply · active 812 weeks ago
Right on. It's as if they don't understand the reality of the situation.
For relief of Cancer patients, A.I.D.S. waisting diseases etc. of course I would say yes. But it it a lawless law that allows anybody with a forged script, or sore toe, or hangnail to get a script. Children here are talking about becoming pot farmers when they get out of high school. YouTube videos showing kids getting babys, cats, dogs stoned. Yesterday a Red Bluff California 19 year old girl was arrested for pictures of herself giving her 2 year old daughter pot.

Its just the beginning...Trying to justify forcing pot on babys and children makes me sicker...

http://www.redding.com/news/2009/nov/06/red-bluff...

"Do not be unequally yoked together with unbelievers.

For what fellowship has righteousness with lawlessness?

And what communion has light with darkness?

And what accord has Christ with Belial?

Or what part has a believer with an unbeliever?

And what agreement has the temple of God with idols?

2 Corinthians 6
1 reply · active 812 weeks ago
Hum I went to school here where I live and that was over 25 years ago. Nothing you said in this comment is new. I knew a few that wanted to raise pot when they got out of school. I knew of a few couples that had kids that got into their pot and we are talking under 5 years old. I knew a few people that did the dog and cat thing, of course I never did that lol, with both beer and pot. This is something that has been going on many years but since the internet we are able to see it.
Does a town of 90,000 need more than 40 pot dealer shops ?
I guess if you smoke it enough things like this wont bother you... Or does it ?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NroN-ctEjg8
6 replies · active 812 weeks ago
I don't smoke it and yes it does bother me that people do it. It seems you are making to big a deal about it, as if it is something new. If you look at most studies you find that pot is no where near as dangerous for people as alcohol is. If you disagree with the law where you are, try to get it changed. I think it should be legal the same as alcohol and controlled the same way. No law will keep people from doing stupid stuff and trying to make laws for that purpose have always failed. The best examples are all the drug laws.
I find the video disgusting. As with most things like this, I think the people involved should be held accountable. But this has nothing to do with feeding the hungry. If you have a problem with marijuana use, don't smoke it, don't support it, don't condone it. I happen to agree with the science on this one, it is not as harmful as drinking. I don't care if people smoke it. And I know cancer patients who us it to help get through chemo, so any assertion that it is just the hangnail crowd is BS.
You dident read the first sentence of my post...

"For relief of Cancer patients, A.I.D.S. waisting diseases etc. of course I would say yes."

My assertion is that it goes on much further than that.
I agree with you then. The medical dispensary issue needs to be resolved. My preference would be to make its use legal and hold people accountable for abuse like we do with alcohol. As for the Christian mission rejecting the donation, I think it is deplorable.
You are speaking to the Director of Redding Loaves and Fishes, and I am not the only Christian food bank in Northern California to reject this type of donation.

"Shasta Lake City Food Bank Says Just Say No
Collective Food Denied at Food Bank"

http://reddingloavesandfishes.com/forum/index.php...
And it really makes no sense to me. That is all I'm saying. Food is food. What your are doing is playing politics with hunger. It is deplorable.

Post a new comment

Comments by