Ok - lets call this one an opinion and not a review. Because, when I watched The Lost Tomb of Jesus with my brain off, it was great fun. It told a story I wanted to believe, a plausible story about a normal guy, with a wife and child, who happened to have started a great religion. The story that the documentary presents is one that I think is likely to have happened from an occam's razor type of "best fit if you eliminate Jesus being divine" kind of approach. As an Atheist, I theorize that the hole divine aspect to the life of Jesus was made up after the fact as his religion gained power. The only reasonable explanation is that Jesus was just a normal man.
Back to the documentary - When the documentary ends, I smiled to myself ad my brain woke up from its two hour nap. I found myself frowning while pulling on my big red beard. I thought a very unscientific, "what a load of crap". They oversold a weak hypothesis.
Part of what I do for a living is tear apart weak hypothesizes. Every week, I examine faulty reasoning in my quest to figure out what is really going on in the fast paced world of manufacturing. I have a nose for it. My basic problem solving method is to assume everybody is leaving something out - and then finding the missing pieces. The Tomb of Jesus was full of missing pieces. Ted Koppel astutely focused on this point in the after show discussion. It made me squirm to watch.
In the case of The Lost Tomb of Jesus, the filmmaker, Simcha Jacobovici, builds a chain of reasoning where each link is dependent on the last. He does not mention the "alternative explanations" that would lead a critical mind in a different direction. instead, he pushes ahead with a faulty "follow the evidence" approach, building a house of cards on flimsy reasoning. I don't buy it.
I think that the most reasonable outcome of this documentary would be a scientific re-examination of all of the evidence. If that is what the Jacobovici intended, then the documentary has served its purpose. However, after watching closely, I can only assume that Jacobovici was trying to present his story as fact. In which case - I think he needs to go back to the drawing board.