Saturday, August 18, 2012

Father Angel Perez arrested

AngelPerezFather Angel Armando Perez, a 46-year-old Catholic priest at Saint Luke Catholic Church in Woodburn, was arrested earlier this week for allegedly fondling a 12-year-old boy. I waited a few days to post this story because I had a feeling people would have a lot to say about this case. I was right too. What Perez is accused of doing is so outrageous that it sounds like a made for TV movie. Here is the story:

An irresponsible mother allowed her son to spend the night alone with a local Catholic priest. The priest, Angel Perez, alleged gave the boy beer while they watched TV together. After the boy passed out on an air mattress, the priest fondled the boy and took photos with his camera phone. The boy woke up during the abuse and fled the house. The priest followed in his underwear. A local man protected the boy from the priest and made sure he got back to his family. The priest went to the victims house, admitted his crime, and then begged forgiveness. The priest later claimed he was too drunk to remember what he had done but not too drunk to drive the victims house. You can read the whole story here.

The victim’s mother is proud of her son.

The mother said she is still in shock, but that she is proud of how quickly her son got away from a bad situation.

Immediately after the incident, the boy ran from the priest’s Woodburn house while Perez chased him down the street in his underwear, the court record states. Residents standing outside at the time took the boy to his sister’s house, where he told her “Father Angel touched me in my privates,” according to court documents.

I think the mother and father are idiots. Who leaves their children with a priest these days? Who lets their kids go on an un-chaperoned overnight trip with a priest? It’s like they served up the boy as a meal for a hungry pedophile. I don’t care if the mother taught her son what to do if somebody touched his privates, she should have taught her son that a priest is likely to be the person that does the touching. I hope the victim will come to know that his parents are just as much to blame for what happened to him as the priest.  

The priest has a high-powered lawyer, which is good because he will need somebody to broker his sentencing. Of course, Archdiocese of Portland is paying for it, which makes no sense at all.

Angel Perez has hired attorney Marc Blackman and the Archdiocese of Portland has made him an open-ended loan to pay for the legal fees according to The Oregonian.

Good Catholics should rejoice in knowing that their donations are going towards defending an alleged pedophile.

Perez is being held without bail on numerous charges, including DUI.

Geez… it’s like a parade of stupid.

Hat tip to Soren HIll for sending me this story.

Comments (4)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
I agree that a responsible parent should not allow a one-on-one sleepover with a priest...OR a teacher, fireman, policeman, protestant minister, YOU, or ME. Not unless the person is well known and there is a good reason for such trust.

Most priests are GOOD MEN. I object to your statement that a priest is more likely to sexually assault a child. Actually, the greatest danger by percentage is sadly in the family itself.

Let's not tar and feather all priests because of a few bad ones.

Meanwhile, parents must do a better job of protecting their children from EVERYONE, and there must be policies in place and they must be well known that such situations where a priest would be alone with a child is not permitted.
I AM A PARISHNER AT ST. LUKES CHURCH AND I AM KEEPING IN MIND THAT A PRIESTS ACTIONS DON'T DEFINE MY RELIGION OR MY BELIEF IN GOD. WE MUST KEEP OURSELVES IN CHECK ON THIS ISSUE....I CHOOSE NOT TO CAST THE FIRST STONE. I CHOOSE TO UNDERSTAND THAT GOD IS THE JUDGE AND JURY HERE. MY HEART GOES OUT TO THIS YOUNG VICTIM AND ALSO TO FATHER ANGEL. WHILE FATHER CLEARLY HAS PROBLEMS, IT IS SO VERY SAD FOR ALL WHO LOOKED UP TO HIM AND PUT THEIR TRUST IN HIS GUIDENCE. AS FAR AS MY DONATIONS GOING TO HELP IN HIS DEFENSE, REMEMBER....IT IS A LOAN TO HIM AND OUR DONATIONS GO TOWARD MANY PROGRAMS TO HELP FAMILIES AND THE SCHOOL IN OUR PARISH. WHY ARE PEOPLE SO QUICK TO RUB SALT INTO A WOUND THAT IS SO DEEP AT THIS TIME. WE NEED TO BE MORE COMPASIONATE AND CARING OF OTHERS.
Innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. That's what the Constitution says. However, it doesn't seem to apply to clergy accused of crimes, and many other *accused* of committing felonies. While the reported details are not favorable for the accused, keep in mind the degraded state of the media. Most of all, think about what you would want and expect of your constitutional rights if you were arrested and charged with a crime? I've seen people being questioned for jury duty and was disappointed in the answers of many. Sometimes I think "Twelve Angry Men" should be required viewing for all pootential jurors.
1 reply · active 641 weeks ago
Route 101 - innocent until proven guilty in the eyes of the law� not the eyes of the public.

Post a new comment

Comments by