Wednesday, August 11, 2010

Is the Tea Party co-opting Christian values?

Wayne Slater, a reporter for the Dallas News, asks a misleading question in the paper’s political and religious news blog known as the Trail Blazer.

Is the Tea Party movement taking religion out of our political debate?

I snorted when I read the question. The build-up had lead me to think that the Tea Party’s motives were pure libertarian blue. I know better. I can’t see the libertarian blue though the blood of Christ.  The real question should be, “Why is religion such a strong part of the Tea Party’s rhetoric? “

Slater writes:

To be sure, there are plenty of religious conservatives at Tea Party rallies. But the movement's central instinct is about low taxes, small government and just leaving me alone. Whether you think they've used or misused the Bible, the Religious Right was about integrating faith-based principles in our public policy. The Tea Party's about big government and the bottom line.

I watch the Tea Party. Heck, I’m a libertarian. I hear the libertarian message buried in their rhetoric, but I also hear religious bigotry masquerading as conservative Christian values. Why is Slater trying to separate the two issues? Oh, wait, his post was a softball meant for the religious right. Hey batter… swing.

CYNTHIA RIGBY, W.C. Brown Professor of Theology, Austin Presbyterian Theological Seminary writes:

The Tea Party's sparser use of religious rhetoric seems to me to be mainly for strategic reasons. While the movement may sound "more Ayn Rand than the Bible," it is comprised of and driven by a significant proportion of socially conservative Christians who believe the Bible supports their political views.

Translation – Don’t worry, the Tea Party is a Christian movement.

MATTHEW WILSON, Associate Professor of Political Science, Southern Methodist University

We are emphatically not better off as a society if we uncouple faith from the making of public policy. In the absence of guiding moral principles and convictions about the nature of the good society, politics is reduced to nothing more than an atavistic struggle over resources. Does anyone really think that our political discussion is enriched by ignoring the big, enduring questions like when the inviolable right to life begins, or what the nature of marriage is, or how God should be acknowledged in the public square?

Translation – The Tea Party is carrying the standard for Christian conservatism, and… stop gay marriage.

GEORGE A. MASON, Senior Pastor Wilshire Baptist Church, Dallas

But it isn't always easy to disentangle our religion and politics. For instance, Tea Party members who are informed by their religious convictions might be perfectly willing to uncouple the two as long as the political positions reflect their religious convictions. More liberal organizations have been somewhat comfortable with the fusion of their religious ideals with more secular politics, but it might be healthier for democracy if they would state how their faith perspectives inform their politics.

Translation – The Tea Party had better remember their roots or there will be hell to pay.

The Tea Party is not a libertarian movement. It’s Christian Conservatives masquerading as a new political movement. They are play acting  as wild-eyed libertarian reformers and nothing more. They are motivated by a moral and social agenda that runs beneath the surface of every libertarian sounding party plank. I predict that a few years from now they will be an embarrassing political memory. And then my fellow libertarians can get back to the serious business of losing elections.

Technorati Tags: ,,

Comments (7)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Mojoey, you confuse me. Just a few days ago, you posted a call to Christians to hold their members accountable, get involved in politics, live by their values, citing such examples as the obligation Mormons had to Prop 8 and stating that a pastor who doesn't get involved in politics is a coward.

(I quote: He insists that getting involved with politics and/or institutionalized religion pollutes his mission. I assert he is a coward who is afraid to confront hatred and is living a life that is inconstant with his values.)

So -- Christians should get involved when their values call others to compassion and equality, Christians should get involved when calling out the mistakes of their members, Christians should get involved when their stance lines up with yours --- but when they stop being cowardly, live their values, get involved in politics in a way that conflicts with your values, then it is a problem and they are "play acting as wild-eyed libertarian reformers"?

You can't have it both ways. If you want them involved in some, you have to accept their involvement in all. And if I totally misread the previous (quoted) post, please do feel free to email or comment and clarify. I would love to understand this seeming contradiction.
6 replies · active 770 weeks ago
Did you comprehend the article. He was complaining about the fact that Christians are masquerading as Libertarian. Why he is surprised that Christians seeking dominion over the world lie, cheat & steal to accomplish their global new world order is beyond reason. Which Christians must compartmentalize or go insane. Being so evil and believing its good is the ultimate crippling of humanity.
Well no, if that's what meant. I missed the point,

Sent from my iPhone
hopefully my reply to Sov. John clarifies my point, though I'd still really like clarification from you, for my own benefit, as to the seeming conflict in the two posts. Thanks.
thanks, Sov. John; I understood this post quite well - that Christians are the majority make-up of the Tea Party, and (supposedly) hiding the fact they're Christians, or rather, using the Tea Party to further their cause(s). I get that part.

What I don't get, and maybe I just don't get the post I quoted, is that a few posts back he (Mojoey) called a pastor a coward for NOT living his beliefs and NOT getting involved in politics. There's a disconnect for me there -- how is one Christian a coward who stays out of politics, and another drug (dragged?) through the mud for jumping in, forming a new party, and trying to shake up the political scene?

If they (Christians) get involved in politics, they'll be a part of some party. I just don't get the upset here -- Mojoey, I'm truly, sincerely inviting you to explain it to me. I think you know me well enough to know I'm not trying to stir up trouble, just trying to understand.
<p style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt">A small clarification - I called my friend a coward for not confronting Christians who misuse politics. By definition, the only way he can do that is to join the debate, however lopsided and obscured it is. He refuses because it "dirty politics" and he want to concentrate on building his own brand.
Okay, thanks for clarifying, Mojoey. I did misunderstand that other post, then. Sorry 'bout that.

Post a new comment

Comments by