Friday, December 11, 2009

Nutter botches son’s circumcision

Via Fetid Fruit

A B.C. man who botched the circumcision of his four-year-old son — a few years after managing to infect his own penis while circumcising himself — should be jailed for 12 to 24 months, a prosecutor says.

Source: Prosecutors seek jail for B.C. dad who botched son’s circumcision.

This screams Christian nutball. Let’s see if it gets any better.

Wielding a razor blade, the father tried to cut away the foreskin on the boy's penis.

After making several cuts over a cutting board, the father sprinkled an ash-like powder called Wonder Dust on his son. The substance is normally used to treat wounds for race horses and other animals and is not deemed fit for use on humans.

OK, that's getting worse. I think we have a nutball. But just to be sure…

In late 2004 or early 2005, DJW circumcised himself, using Band-Aids, peroxide and a roll of gauze and a clear plastic ring, which he believed would act as an anesthetic. He cut himself with a razor blade. The procedure infected his penis.

Ding ding ding.... we have a nutball. I say send him to prison for a few years and then the mental hospital.

Comments (8)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
How does someone think of doing something like this? I think they are being to easy on him and hope that he isn't allowed to have unsupervised visits with his kids not that they should allow him any contact at all.
That skin's on there for a reason you wackjob!
It's a shame he was able to procreate.
When I saw the title of this post in my feed reader, I really tried to resist reading it. I knew it would be stomach-turning, but I just couldn't stop myself. Ugh!
1 reply · active 799 weeks ago
You cannot resist... the title compels you.
This is why I am a fan of forcing people to have psychological screenings before they are allowed to raise children whether or not they are their own children.
You realise his only crime was doing it badly? It's perfectly legal for anyone at all to circumcise someone else, including their own baby or child (you don't need consent for that) - just as long as they don't pass themselves off as a doctor when they do it.

Is this guy really so much more nuts than a whole world that makes a special case of a male baby's foreskin? It's the only normal, healthy, integral, functional, erogenous, non-renewable body part that may be cut off at parental whim (while the exactly equivalent female part is specially protected by law). If that weren't so, this guy might never have thought of doing it.
1 reply · active less than 1 minute ago
I do realize it is legal. What is odd is that he choose to do it himself, and to do it poorly.
There are plenty of times circumcisionist doctors botch worse than this
and i would give a ding ding ding to the guy below (one of countless examples).

http://www.news.com.au/botched-circumcision-put-b...

Post a new comment

Comments by