Wednesday, June 30, 2010

Youth Pastor Matthew Nichols arrested

Deemed a danger to the community, Lutheran youth pastor Matthew Nichols of Bethlehem Evangelical Lutheran Church, was denied bond after his arrest for possession of child pornography. The most disturbing aspect of this case is that Nichols has a criminal past involving sexual activity with minors in Pennsylvania. Which process failed this time?

ICE made the bust.

ICE began investigating Nichols in October 2009 after receiving information from the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children about an email address that had been used to transmit child pornography which was traced to Nichols' home and Bethlehem Evangelical Luther Church. The New Mexico Attorney General's Office, the New Mexico State Police and FBI assisted ICE in the case

His church is standing behind him.

Jerry Ethridge, president of its board of directors, said in an videotaped interview posted on the Los Alamos Monitor website that Nichols will remain on paid leave until the matter is resolved.

"Matt is a very well-performing employee of the congregation," he said. "All indications from both parents and all the children (are) that during that period of time, there's been no ... inappropriate action by Matt."

Background checks performed by the church did not show Nichols’ criminal history.

Ethridge says the church consistently runs background checks on church members and parents who chaperon children and somehow Nichols had passed two such tests without raising any red flags.

"Even in the background investigation and the interviews with him and the references none of that information came up," he said.

What’s a church to do? For starters they gutted their website. Most links are broken, and no news or statements are available. They have not disclosed their vetting process. We don’t know if vetting included a legitimate background check or if they were simply googling a name. And finally, we know that the church is protecting it’s pastor. I want to know why.

Hat tip: SLOG

Comments (4)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
i dont think it's so much that they're protecting him but his families and their families from the outside till they have a chance to process all this new information for themselves.
it must be hard for some to come to terms with the fact that any trust you had in this person is lost destroyed and it makes you question yourself. Others passing judgment on their actions is also a hard thing to cope with.
how do you cope with the fact that you allowed a predator into your midst? Protecting yourself from the whole of the outside world is the least you can do when a whole community is feeling utterly vulnerable right now.
Their sensibilities are more important than our prying eyes at this point. At least that is the impression i get from why they have shut down their links. I havent checked the website myself.
1 reply · active less than 1 minute ago
I would say they are protecting him and the church. If it comes to light that they failed to do a proper background check, who will suffer the most? The church and we all know that most leaders within a church put it ahead of all of the members of a church.

I agree that many are feeling uneasy about the trust they give to the leadership of the church. They should be demanding answers not worrying about protecting the church and those that failed to find this youth pastors past.
Could the church be following the Law of the Land which indicates that a person is innocent until proven guilty? Too often in cases of a sexual nature, a person is presumed guilty;especially when it's a pastor. Let's let this whole thing play out. Yes, everyone has a right for the truth to come out. Even the accused. If he's guilty, string him up. If not, leave him alone.
1 reply · active less than 1 minute ago
The church has a duty of care to protect the flock. The must do something until the allegation clears or they will risk liability.

Post a new comment

Comments by