Wednesday, April 22, 2009

A Pastor’s $600K compensation package

There is something fundamentally wrong with paying a pastor $600K to lead a church. The ostentatious display of wealth for a religion that is supposedly build on service and charity is as out of place as diamonds on a skid row bum. At least some of the parishioners had the good sense to file a lawsuit.

Manhattan's Riverside Church - one of the country's most illustrious religious institutions - is paying its new senior pastor, the Rev. Brad Braxton, more than $600,000 in annual compensation.

That's twice what Braxton's predecessor, James Forbes, one of the country's best-known preachers, was getting after running Riverside for more than 18 years.

Read More…

Why do men like Pastor Braxton demand such a high salary? I do not mean to offend people with this question. I am curious. Do people think that becoming a pastor is they way to grow rich? A friend once told me that the salary of a pastor should be no more than the average of the church. This seems fair. Is the average salary of Riverside Church $600K? Something tells me no.

Pastor Braxton seems like the real deal. He was a Rhodes Scholar, earned a Masters Degree at the University of Oxford, England. And earned Ph.D. at Emory University. He preaches well, and writes even better. Plus – he stood up against proposition 8. The man is good and honestly, I like him, which makes me wonder all the more about the inconsistency in his pay. Can anyone explain it?

His compensation package is generous:

  • $250,000 in salary.
  • $11,500 monthly housing allowance.
  • Private school tuition for his child.
  • A full-time maid.
  • Entertainment, travel and "professional development" allowances.
  • Pension and life insurance benefits.
  • An equity allowance for Braxton to save up to buy a home.

If he were running a business, I would not consider it odd. But then, a church is a business, right?

Technorati tags: ,

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Comments (7)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
EndUnknown's avatar

EndUnknown · 837 weeks ago

Churches are the way to get the benefits of for profit organizations as well as the tax exemption of non profit orgs.
Wait a minute - $11,500 monthly housing allowance AND an equity allowance so he can buy a home? Seriously? $11,500 isn't enough?

Tell you what - he can buy MY house by assuming the mortgage, and I'll "save up" to buy a new house out of the remaining $10,000 in his housing allowance, and the church can keep the equity allowance. We all win!
Somegreencat's avatar

Somegreencat · 837 weeks ago

This type of salary is exactly why churches should be paying taxes and not be considered non-profit.
$600k is chicken feed to the big televangelists. Besides, who cares what he makes...its the sheep he's shearing that are paying for him. If they dont like it...let them leave the church. A shaman should get as much as he can from his mindless followers.

As for his being the "real deal"..Heheh... there is nothing "real" about superstition and promulgating it among the ignorant and mentally subservient . That he has prestigious degrees doesn't make what he is dealing any more real than what some dirt bag diploma mill charlatan sells. They are one and the same product.

Hump
Jesus loves you.
Nate,
Cool! Does he give head?
Nice post! This post is really useful. Thank you for sharing such a amazing post with all of us. Keep sharing more.
Top Cold Chain Companies

Post a new comment

Comments by