Well, not really.
May I confess that upon first seeing her, I liked her looks? With the sound off, she presents a not uncomely frontal appearance.
But now, as the Brits say, Ill be glad to see the back of her.
Cavett wrote this wonderful little snippet on his New York Times blog in a witty post titled, The Wild Wordsmith of Wasilla. Go ahead, give it a read. You know you want too.
BEN PATT · 855 weeks ago
AS AN EDITORIAL FRIEND OF MINE REMARKED, "iF SARAH'S NO THOMAS JEFFERSON, THEN CAVETT'S NO JAMES J. KILPATRICK."
HE ADDED, "yOU'D THINK THAT THE NYT COULD AT LEAST CHECK HIS SYNTAX BEFORE PUBLICATION!" (OF COURSE, CAVETT HAD THE ADVANTAGE OF WRITING, WHICH IS EASIER TO EDIT THAN SARAH'S TALKING.)
WELL EVEN THOUGH POOR SARAH IS NOT THE ELITIST SNOB THAT DICKIE IS, AT LEAST SHE HAS A BETTER BOOK DEAL ($7 MILL) TO HELP HERSELF FIND A LITTLE HAPPINESS!
bigplate · 855 weeks ago