Friday, July 21, 2006

Gay marriage and divorce

In May of 2004, I wrote a short post celebrating the marriage of Julie and Hillary Goodridge and their landmark first ever legal same-sex marriage. At the time, I hailed their marriage as a significant step forward for civil rights in the United States. In the back of my mind, I wondered about the new crop of gay marriages. I wondered when we would see the first gay divorce. I guessed maybe five years down the road. I was wrong.

Over half of all marriages end in divorce, why would a gay marriage be any different. I had 50 hits on my origianl post today. When I followed up to see why, I found that gay trailblazers Julie and Hillary Goodridge are separated and heading for a divorce. That’s right, after a little more than two years, the Goodridges are calling it quits.

What does this mean? It means absolutely nothing! In my heart of hearts, I had wished them a happy and healthy marriage. After all, there is a child involved. The fact that they intend to divorce simply cements their normalcy. So many of my acquaintances, though few of my friends, are already on their second and third marriages. Why would we hold gay marriages to a different standard?


Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

Comments (2)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
I'm so tired of the gay marriage debate. The only people I see fighting against gay marriage are the people who think that homosexuality is a bad thing that they don't want connected to something they love (the institution of marriage). How is this any different than me saying I don't want my favorite sports team to run beer adverts because I think beer is immoral (that's a hypothetical, obviously)? This is not a question of human rights, it's just a debate over who wants it more.

Frankly I don't think there is any good reason to defend gay marriage against anything when marriage is only a symbol, not a real tangible thing. Anyone who wants to dicker about the tax loopholes and other goodies you can get from being married could just as easily argue that those things should be available to people who aren't married at all. Am I being discriminated against because I can't visit my best friend in the hospital at certain times? Perhaps, but I'm not convinced that it's a violation of my human rights to keep me from doing so.
Great one.

Post a new comment

Comments by